<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Flexes On Page Rank Debate Once Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/</link>
	<description>Small Business Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rahsia Komputer : komuniti panduan komputer &#38; internet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google PageRank...</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5922</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahsia Komputer : komuniti panduan komputer &#38; internet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google PageRank...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5922</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral - Marketing Ideas Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Internet Video Marketing - The Next Step For Search</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5567</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral - Marketing Ideas Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Internet Video Marketing - The Next Step For Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5567</guid>
		<description>[...] very interesting to see how search is evolving these days. We have the whole paid links controversy heating things up again, as always, plus much more debate about the search industry as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very interesting to see how search is evolving these days. We have the whole paid links controversy heating things up again, as always, plus much more debate about the search industry as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pedersen Golf</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5528</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pedersen Golf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5528</guid>
		<description>Why do people worry so much about google. They could bury on of the online businesses in the blink of an eye.  Write good content on a consistent basis, and let the cards fall where they may.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people worry so much about google. They could bury on of the online businesses in the blink of an eye.  Write good content on a consistent basis, and let the cards fall where they may.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google pagerank sedang dikemas kini &#124; Blog Webmaster Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5527</link>
		<dc:creator>Google pagerank sedang dikemas kini &#124; Blog Webmaster Malaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5527</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selling Links? Google is Gonna Spank You! &#124; Thatedeguy</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5524</link>
		<dc:creator>Selling Links? Google is Gonna Spank You! &#124; Thatedeguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5524</guid>
		<description>[...] Jim Kukral seems to think along the same lines, saying that You know what I think? I think that Google is gonna get what they want, regardless of what some bloggers or seoâ€™rs say or do or think. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jim Kukral seems to think along the same lines, saying that You know what I think? I think that Google is gonna get what they want, regardless of what some bloggers or seoâ€™rs say or do or think. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are selling text links a thing of the past? &#124; Blogging Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>Are selling text links a thing of the past? &#124; Blogging Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8216;Official: Selling Paid Links Can Hurt Your PageRank Or Rankings On Google&#8216; (found via Jim Krukal). The article focuses on some popular sites losing their PageRank recently, notably The Stanford [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8216;Official: Selling Paid Links Can Hurt Your PageRank Or Rankings On Google&#8216; (found via Jim Krukal). The article focuses on some popular sites losing their PageRank recently, notably The Stanford [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatedeguy</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5521</link>
		<dc:creator>thatedeguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5521</guid>
		<description>I really hope that this is just a bump in the road to a new PR pushout.  If not, and these &quot;penalties&quot; remain, there are going to be a lot of very unhappy web admins.  And how many of those push traffic to the Google search?  I know I do.  I could just as easily push it to Yahoo or MSN or Live or ASK.  And if we all would do so, that could mean a pretty big drop in their marketshare (1-2% anyways) and that could affect their ad revenue as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope that this is just a bump in the road to a new PR pushout.  If not, and these &#8220;penalties&#8221; remain, there are going to be a lot of very unhappy web admins.  And how many of those push traffic to the Google search?  I know I do.  I could just as easily push it to Yahoo or MSN or Live or ASK.  And if we all would do so, that could mean a pretty big drop in their marketshare (1-2% anyways) and that could affect their ad revenue as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Table Pad</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5519</link>
		<dc:creator>Table Pad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5519</guid>
		<description>Just because google will get what they want does not make it right. Bad buzz can indeed cause a lot of damage, in this case, it could well turn out to be the big G. I hope that they too realize that it is not good business to p**s bloggers off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because google will get what they want does not make it right. Bad buzz can indeed cause a lot of damage, in this case, it could well turn out to be the big G. I hope that they too realize that it is not good business to p**s bloggers off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoskred</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5518</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoskred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5518</guid>
		<description>The question is, are Google the police force of paid links on the internet? Or are they supposed to represent the true state of the internet?

It seems to me they are heading towards being the police force. Who gave them the job? Who gives them the right to judge which paid links are bad, and which are good? We the searchers do. We use their service to search the web. 

The trouble is, there&#039;s other search engines out there which can give just as good if not better results. If Google annoy people, people will move to different search engines. 

Google may well get what they want, but it might be at the cost of everything they have worked so hard for. People will become anti-google, and they will steer well clear of them. And some smart internet marketer will come along and create something even better, and there will be enough people annoyed with Google that they will start using it, and they will tell their friends, they will blog about it. Who will that person be? That&#039;s the only question.

The blogosphere is a powerful force, we&#039;ve all seen that. Buzz can do a lot for a company.  Bad buzz can do a lot to hurt a company.

I guess we&#039;ll have to wait and see. But I don&#039;t think it is a good business decision to p*ss bloggers off. That&#039;s my opinion.

Snoskred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, are Google the police force of paid links on the internet? Or are they supposed to represent the true state of the internet?</p>
<p>It seems to me they are heading towards being the police force. Who gave them the job? Who gives them the right to judge which paid links are bad, and which are good? We the searchers do. We use their service to search the web. </p>
<p>The trouble is, there&#8217;s other search engines out there which can give just as good if not better results. If Google annoy people, people will move to different search engines. </p>
<p>Google may well get what they want, but it might be at the cost of everything they have worked so hard for. People will become anti-google, and they will steer well clear of them. And some smart internet marketer will come along and create something even better, and there will be enough people annoyed with Google that they will start using it, and they will tell their friends, they will blog about it. Who will that person be? That&#8217;s the only question.</p>
<p>The blogosphere is a powerful force, we&#8217;ve all seen that. Buzz can do a lot for a company.  Bad buzz can do a lot to hurt a company.</p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait and see. But I don&#8217;t think it is a good business decision to p*ss bloggers off. That&#8217;s my opinion.</p>
<p>Snoskred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5516</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 06:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/google-flexes-on-page-rank-debate-once-again/#comment-5516</guid>
		<description>It is not just the SEOs or bloggers, there are other stake holders in this debate.

I know Sam isn&#039;t too keen on PPP, but in many ways selling pure site-wide links is much worse for the search engines.

The interesting situation is the way they are flipping what the toolbar pagerank means - they have turned it into a link buying guide, it is useless now for end users to use as any indicator of quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not just the SEOs or bloggers, there are other stake holders in this debate.</p>
<p>I know Sam isn&#8217;t too keen on PPP, but in many ways selling pure site-wide links is much worse for the search engines.</p>
<p>The interesting situation is the way they are flipping what the toolbar pagerank means &#8211; they have turned it into a link buying guide, it is useless now for end users to use as any indicator of quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
