<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobody Wants To Steal, But Videos Are Better With Copywritten Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimkukral.com/nobody-wants-to-steal-but-videos-are-better-with-copywritten-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/nobody-wants-to-steal-but-videos-are-better-with-copywritten-content/</link>
	<description>Small Business Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.jimkukral.com/nobody-wants-to-steal-but-videos-are-better-with-copywritten-content/comment-page-1/#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimkukral.com/nobody-wants-to-steal-but-videos-are-better-with-copywritten-content/#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll talk more about it on my site later, but to give a preview here, what is inconsistent at YouTube, at least when it comes to copyright issues, is not YouTube&#039;s policies, but the detection and enforcement by copyright holders.

To use NBC as an example, YouTube only removes clips from NBC that it is told to do so. It is rarely, if ever, proactive. If NBC only reports one clip, that clip gets removed and others stay. Also, if YouTube gets a copyright complaint from someone overstepping copyright law, like with Uri, they usually do remove it though they don&#039;t have to. It&#039;s cheaper, in their mind, to blindly follow the notices rather than wrestle with potential consequences later.

Sadly YouTube&#039;s policy is inconsistent but its not really their fault, they can only do what they are told. Now, this only applies to copyright law, I&#039;m not making any comment on their other policies. 

Those they can take full credit for...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll talk more about it on my site later, but to give a preview here, what is inconsistent at YouTube, at least when it comes to copyright issues, is not YouTube&#8217;s policies, but the detection and enforcement by copyright holders.</p>
<p>To use NBC as an example, YouTube only removes clips from NBC that it is told to do so. It is rarely, if ever, proactive. If NBC only reports one clip, that clip gets removed and others stay. Also, if YouTube gets a copyright complaint from someone overstepping copyright law, like with Uri, they usually do remove it though they don&#8217;t have to. It&#8217;s cheaper, in their mind, to blindly follow the notices rather than wrestle with potential consequences later.</p>
<p>Sadly YouTube&#8217;s policy is inconsistent but its not really their fault, they can only do what they are told. Now, this only applies to copyright law, I&#8217;m not making any comment on their other policies. </p>
<p>Those they can take full credit for&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
