Jim Kukral's Free Blog Setup - Start Your Blog Today!
 

The Blog

The Death Of The A-list

It’s July 2008. Robert Scoble walks the early morning iphone3G line yelling “you’re live on the internet” while broadcasting live on his Nokia phone via Qik.com. But does anyone care what he’s doing or knows who he is? From the looks of the dreary eyed people in line, the answer is no, they just want to get their iphone and go home.

Later that same day, Jason Calacanis decides to tell the world he’s quitting blogging in a dramatic long-form blog post. Six months ago, this might have caught on and made the front page of Techmeme (for those who still read it), but right about now, most people are calling drama or bullshit.

alist

Are you catching my drift? The thing we like to call “the a-list” is fading away. In fact, I think it might be already dead. Guys like Scoble and Winer and Calacanis and Arrington, and the rest, well, someone stole their mojo and they’re trying really hard to get it back by grasping at straws by trying to build the hugest Friendfeed list, for example.

But they’re not going to be able to get it back, even with a biggest list of subscribers. Their mojo has been stolen.

The a-list, if you ever believed there was such a thing (there was), is dying. No, let me clarify, it’s dead. It’s been eliminated. Not because those are bad people or they did anything wrong…

But because it’s just not needed anymore.

Years ago I was the publisher of a group “meta” blog called Revenews.com. When I took over the blog, we were still at a point on the Internets when it wasn’t common place for everyone to have their own blog. Because of that, Revenews was a sought after place to blog at because of its reputation and reach. It was needed by many.

But guess what happened to Revenews after a while? It was no longer needed. Why? Because at some point in time the bloggers who once needed Revenews to get their name and thoughts out there figured out that they didn’t really need Revenews anymore and they could simply do it on their own.

It was about that same time when the a-list was born. These titans of tech and attention weren’t stuck working on “meta” blogs like the rest of us. They instead stood out and took risks and put themselves out there and made personal names for themselves.

They were needed.

In fact, it can be argued that we, their audience, created the a-list out of a want of leaders and innovators. It became our own Frankenstein, and we loved our baby Frank. We coddled him and praised him and wiped his ass, and yes, scolded him when he made a mistake, but like any child, we forgave him in the end.

So here we are, years later, watching our Frankenstein grow up, grow old, and fade away into oblivion. It’s not because we don’t love him anymore, but simply because we just don’t need him anymore.

So why did the a-list die?

I’m sure you’ve got your own reasons. I don’t presume to have the right answers, but I have opinions. Here are some.

The a-list died because of social networking tools. It used to be that connecting with thousands of people could only be done if you had massive reach like an a-lister. However, with tools like Friendfeed and Twitter, anyone can reach out and “friend” up with anyone, causing millions of new connections of regular people.

The a-list died because the sharing of information became easier to do. In the past, the a-list was in charge of spreading the virus, but today is no longer needed, we can do it ourselves.

The a-list died because we used to have to rely on them to innovate and guide us to the new things. But we don’t need that anymore. We’ve reached a point where we have the knowledge and the tools to try things ourselves.

The a-list died because we’re tired of them and their incessant drama and posturing for attention. We all just decided enough was enough and called bullshit. It was bound to happen.

The a-list died because guys like Loren Feldman exposed them and made them just regular. You may or may not like Loren or his shtick, but there’s no denying he was a big part of satirizing them and bringing them crashing down to the ground.

It’s over. The revolution happened overnight and we didn’t even know it. We’re all now in charge, together, as one big group collective.

The a-list is dead.

Tags:

When you join Jim's group you join thousands of other successful people who want to work together to grow their brands and businesses. When you join today, you'll get instant access to Jim's latest webinar replay entitled "The New Rules of Self-Publishing".

Business Around A Lifestyle

The world changed on 9/11 in so many different ways. Since that day, there has been a major shift happening in the way people think and live their lives. Sure, many people still chase the dollar as their ultimate goal. However, many more people have begun to realize that the world could, well, end tomorrow.

That's why people are choosing to pursue a business around a lifestyle, instead of a lifestyle controlled by their business. It makes sense, right? If the world was going to end tomorrow, would you still try to live your life in a way you never wanted to?

Take a look around you and you'll see that this shift to becoming a lifestyle entrepreneur is being adopted by more and more people every day. Some of those people are falling into it because they have been laid off from their jobs and are literally forced into it. Some of those people just figure out a way to make it happen because of the "end of the world" thinking mentioned above.

114 Awesome Comments So Far

Don't be a stranger, join the discussion by leaving your own comment
  1. Parakeet
    July 12, 2008 at 9:01 pm #

    A-list or not, I find TechCrunch interesting and even valuable sometimes. Scoble — iditotic, self-agrandizing windbag. Calcanis, never bothered reading. Winer, read once or twice and found nothing interesting (he seemed pissed off in both the visits I made in fact). I'm not interested in celebrity in the slightest. Provide useful and interesting content that is original and not just repeating what others say (a la Scoble) and I'll read.

  2. mack collier
    July 12, 2008 at 10:27 pm #

    Somewhere along the way, many of the (self) annointed A-Listers forgot that it's social media, and started using these wonderful tools as BROADCAST media. They stopped promoting smart ideas, and started promoting themselves.

    And that just ain't too interesting…

  3. Schwegler
    July 12, 2008 at 10:31 pm #

    Meh, there are far more people willing to lap up any content created by Kevin Rose than those living in the social media world. There's still an A-List (for now). I don't even see it as wounded.

    In the future, I think I will see a lot of independent and niche-driven “Mini-A-Lists” if you will… but looking to a small group of people that end up as celebrities will never go away. It's the way of the world.

  4. sbullo
    July 12, 2008 at 11:04 pm #

    There's an a-list? Wow, ok so what happened to reading and following those who happen to have the background, experience and perhaps a little bit of difference to them that your attention is grabbed regardless of whether or not they are well-known or well-loved by all around them? It's high school all over again.

  5. templestark
    July 12, 2008 at 11:19 pm #

    No freakin comments? Well, I for one enjoyed the piece. Right to the point, not a word wasted and no blame attached. I don't know if it's because I just don't care or what but these A-listers have not factored into my life AT ALL. The same as network primetime news – never watched em, never cared.

    PS. oh the comments are down there below this field. Nevermind.

  6. templestark
    July 12, 2008 at 11:22 pm #

    PPS After reading the comments, some people are in serious denial. These peopler didn't get to he A-list by being self-appointed. They got the traffic from somewhere. … I am not in a tech / geek (used in the nicest possible way) industry and simply had no need to follow these people.

  7. steve
    July 13, 2008 at 12:08 am #

    The a-list died because individuals with minimual journalistic talent and/or experience adopted the blogging medium early. Because it was novel and because a lot of people were out of work due to the dot com bubble bursting, they garnered a following.

    Now its five years latter. The professional journalists have adopted the medium, writing quality content on a regular basis is hard, and for most of the audience the novelty has warn off and they are back to work and don't have the time or interest to read sub par content.

  8. Ozegold
    July 13, 2008 at 12:09 am #

    True,as social media has changed, the present 'A listers' have failed to change with it.

    There's probably a natural arrogance that tends to go with being on an A list of any sort, but if those on it don't learn to flow with the tide, they go the way of the dinosaur!

  9. templestark
    July 13, 2008 at 12:14 am #

    It's a little black and white but I like Steve's answer.

  10. templestark
    July 13, 2008 at 12:17 am #

    excellent – the d-list is the new A-ist ;-) shades of but for a typo in the original, “the geek shall inherit the earth.”

  11. JimBob51
    July 13, 2008 at 12:48 am #

    I agree – the social network and the ease of the tools gives everyone the opportunity to make their point “pimp” their blog and have their say. The mere fact that I came to this via a “re Plurk” makes the point entirely. Welcome to the new age – but please learn the etiquette. That is the message – despite what we think there are rules and if broken like any form of communication you will be excluded.

  12. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 12:49 am #

    Great points Mack.

  13. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 12:50 am #

    LOL. How prophetic!

  14. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 12:51 am #

    Yeah, I thought about not using it Steve, but there it was in the #3 google images result for Scoble. I figured it was fair game?

  15. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 12:53 am #

    That's pretty much what I alluded to in my piece Mark, we agree.

  16. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 12:56 am #

    But will these new stars be as big as the old stars were? I don't think we'll duplicate what happened once do to the reasons I stated above.

  17. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 12:58 am #

    Yeah, people are still paying attention to guys like Scoble. There's nothing wrong with that. I follow him and I like reading his thoughts My point was that “his kind” is not needed as much anymore.

  18. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 12:59 am #

    GREAT points Shawn.

  19. daveevans
    July 13, 2008 at 8:30 am #

    Select blog stars will become much larger and morph into global columnists. Makes me think of HuffPo, that's not even a blog anymore.

    Some bloggers will always post 10x a day, the usefulness of this schedule will become less important to most readers. Think NYT op-ed page.

    People love the quickness of blogs, but I would does that help them do you job better or become more efficient or make more money? Not for the majority of readers.

    Maybe I'm too focused on the post-anytime nature of blogs today, but still, I'd rather read and write longer though pieces than 150 words several times a day. Still, I think today's A-listers are brealy breaking the surface. Just wait until blog translation services start to emerge and China is reading you.

  20. PodcastSteve
    July 13, 2008 at 8:43 am #

    Absolutely fair game, and very funny. I had the opportunity to get to know Shel at the SNCR New Communications Forum in California in April. He and I are both Senior Fellows of SNCR, so it was nice to meet in a peer setting. He's quirky, snarky, and very funny. Don't know Scoble, but he's made a very successful brand of himself.

  21. Brian Clark
    July 13, 2008 at 10:36 am #

    Great post Jim. I think the one point you don't address is that tech used to = blogging. Now it doesn't (not even close), but the tech guys don't realize that most people could care less about geekery… blogging is not about technology, it's about people. The more “normal” the blogging demographic looks, the less relevant the nerd herd.

  22. Chetan
    July 13, 2008 at 11:15 am #

    Good post there..
    This is what i agree with entirely -

    The a-list died because we’re tired of them and their incessant drama and posturing for attention. We all just decided enough was enough and called bullshit. It was bound to happen.

  23. Jim Kukral TheBizWebCoach
    July 13, 2008 at 11:21 am #

    Yeah, great point Brian. Tech used to “be” blogging mainstream, you're right.

  24. fmckenna
    July 13, 2008 at 12:57 pm #

    Not sure I consider myself a geek, just an accountant who has an interest and aptitude for technology more than the average CPA. I heard about this post from Twitter, which all of my accounting readers are scared to death of. Except the ones at the beginning of their careers (and a few other hybrids like me.) The 20-somethings are into everything , 24/7, and don't call it “social media.” It just is. And they don't wait for permission from anyone to reach out or to give their opinion. I like that and they push and pull me to to do what I've always done, network, only using new tools. Scoble, Calacanis, Arrington? Might as well be Rocky and Bullwinkle to me and to the 20-somethings. As obscure as those cartoon characters except for the fact sometimes they show up and assume everyone is going to be entertained.

  25. Jon Kepler
    July 13, 2008 at 1:42 pm #

    What about the concept of the A-list now being supported by the media? Mike Arrington remains large because he jumps on TV every so often. Maybe the A-list isn't as strongly defined as it used to be, but I still think getting on CNBC is a milestone that separates you from those who haven't been on.

  26. wil reynolds
    July 13, 2008 at 3:13 pm #

    Shawn, tacky and entitled is SOOO true.

  27. paulmccord
    July 13, 2008 at 5:06 pm #

    Man you did a very good job of putting it in perspective.
    Paul

  28. sonnygill
    July 13, 2008 at 6:43 pm #

    Great post and so true. The numbers game is getting kinda weak – time to put up or move aside.

    And btw – that picture is going to scar me for the rest of my life.

  29. amirulcyber
    July 13, 2008 at 8:41 pm #

    Thank for such a wonderful idea.really thanks.

  30. DomesticMouse
    July 13, 2008 at 9:12 pm #

    Stupid question of the day. You are claiming the A-list is dead because of twitter, friendfeed and co, yet all the stats I see on twitter usage show power laws. Which to me imply the continued existence of an A-list.

    Whether the a-list still includes calcanis and scoble I have no idea. In fact, I unfollowed scoble because he made lots of twitter noise that i couldn't be bothered keeping up with. His breathless excitement was off putting.

  31. Sheamus
    July 18, 2008 at 9:06 pm #

    Until a single so-called A-lister becomes anything more than a Z-lister in the real world – I mean, really, as others have said, even within the Internet itself most of these people are complete unknowns to the majority of everyday folk – I'm not sure anything of this really matters, does it? I can't think of a single blogger who is famous outside of the blogosphere. Even Kevin Rose is a complete nobody to the non-Digg user. David Spade owns him. Heck, Freddie Prinze Jr owns him.

    Relatively, we're talking 'A-list' inside a very small bowl.

  32. Noah David Simon
    July 22, 2008 at 4:12 pm #

    I wish you were right… I really do

  33. Make Quick Cash John
    August 5, 2009 at 1:45 pm #

    Jim..Thanks for your thoughtful ideas on this. I love to read it. I will be waiting for the next posts. Make Quick Cash John.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks