By Jim Kukral
•
July 28, 2007
•
Copyright Infringement, YouTube
•
What’s not clear about this copyright tool for YouTube is if it will effect the millions of infringed videos ALREADY sitting on their network?
I’m very surprised this is coming so quickly. Frankly, I just don’t see how YouTube will be able to survive long term when you enforce this? There are too many videos out there that will NEED to be removed from the network.
I’m going to guess here and say that over 50% of every video they have is infringing on some type of copyright. Can YouTube just stop the news ones? Is that enough? I’m not sure. Fascinating though.
When you join Jim's group you join thousands of other successful people who want to work together to grow their brands and businesses. When you join today, you'll get instant access to Jim's latest webinar replay entitled "The New Rules of Self-Publishing".
Business Around A Lifestyle
The world changed on 9/11 in so many different ways. Since that day, there has been a major shift happening in the way people think and live their lives. Sure, many people still chase the dollar as their ultimate goal. However, many more people have begun to realize that the world could, well, end tomorrow.
That's why people are choosing to pursue a business around a lifestyle, instead of a lifestyle controlled by their business. It makes sense, right? If the world was going to end tomorrow, would you still try to live your life in a way you never wanted to?
Take a look around you and you'll see that this shift to becoming a lifestyle entrepreneur is being adopted by more and more people every day. Some of those people are falling into it because they have been laid off from their jobs and are literally forced into it. Some of those people just figure out a way to make it happen because of the "end of the world" thinking mentioned above.
The problem here is that, under the law and in the eyes of the court, it is worse for YouTube to let infringing videos linger than to delay the removal of new ones. The DMCA provides protection for hosts, under some conditions, if they “expeditiously” act to remove infringing materials once notified, but, if they don’t, they lose all hope of protection.
In short, if they act to remove works after notification, they have at least an argument in their defense, if they don’t, they’re probably toast.
Though there really isn’t anything about this kind of filtering technology in the DMCA, it seems to be an attempt to show good faith and smooth things over with rightsholders.
That being said, I don’t think Google relies as heavily on infringing videos as we think. The top videos are almost always amateur content and there seems to be plenty of non-infringing material on the site. Will it take a hit? Absolutely. But I think it can survive it.
At least I hope so…